Key Points from the Ongoing Negotiations

1. Failure to Meet $100 Billion Goal
   • Rich nations initially promised to mobilize $100 billion annually by 2020, but they only met this target for the first time in 2022. However, much of this financial support has been provided in the form of loans instead of grants, raising questions about the actual value and impact of these funds. The true financial contribution may be far lower than the official OECD figures suggest.
2. Need for a New Finance Goal
   • The $100 billion target is now considered outdated, with many developing countries arguing that it fails to meet the growing needs of vulnerable nations. The new finance goal, slated to be agreed upon before 2025, is expected to be based on the needs of developing countries, which are far greater than the original target. Proposals for the new goal include amounts in the trillions to effectively address both mitigation and adaptation to climate change.
3. The Cost of Climate Change
   • Climate finance needs are vast. According to UNFCCC estimates, developing countries require $502 billion annually by 2030 for their climate plans. However, their total financial needs exceed $5.8 trillion per year when accounting for all climate-related costs, including losses and damages. Countries are calling for these additional costs to be included in the new financial goals.
4. The Role of Fossil Fuel Revenues
   • The $100 billion target is dwarfed by the revenues of the fossil fuel industry, which averages around $3.5 trillion per year. Proposals have emerged for polluters, including fossil fuel companies, to contribute directly to climate finance. This could be done through taxes on fossil fuel extraction or on the windfall profits of major oil companies. Estimates suggest that a climate damages tax could raise up to $720 billion annually by 2030.
5. The Global Need for Fair Contribution
   • The core of the debate centers on justice. Developing countries argue that wealthy nations, who have historically contributed the most to global emissions, should bear the largest share of climate finance. However, some argue that wealthier developing nations, like China, should also contribute. Currently, China does not contribute to the climate finance goal, even though it is the world's largest emitter. Developing countries are frustrated with the lack of action from big emitters like the US, which has failed to meet its fair share of climate financing.
   •  

What is at Stake?

The failure to address climate finance adequately could have catastrophic global consequences. As developing countries face increasing climate impacts, their ability to adapt and transition to cleaner economies is severely limited without sufficient funding. Experts warn that if the current trends continue, the world will fall short of the 1.5°C climate target.

The negotiations in Baku represent not just a financial debate, but a question of justice and global equity. Without an agreement on climate finance, global efforts to tackle climate change are in jeopardy. The outcome of these discussions could set the tone for all future COP summits, as finance emerges as the central issue in the global fight against climate change.